Same applies here. If a large group of people were on the fence on deciding whether or not to purchase MC, and notch says "It's official, <insert feature> will be included in the final release" so you decide to buy the game. Then you receive another notification saying "Just kidding, fooled you" (but in more rational terms), then the group has a valid case for fraud.
All of this assuming the game is no longer in beta.
Reminds me of the time a some guy on the TF2 forums wanted to sew Valve over virtual hats.
You would think, but as with MANY other cases you will never know how they can turn the tables.
Well the thing is, anyone rich enough to find a lawyer good enough to win such a weak case wouldn't be suing. Infact you almost virtually have no case, I don't think any lawyer could win that case.
Im just playing devil's advocate here. I never seriously thought you could successfully sue anyone, I'm just merely stating the truth that in the legal world, anything is possible.
Im just playing devil's advocate here. I never seriously thought you could successfully sue anyone, I'm just merely stating the truth that in the legal world, anything is possible.
Yes anything is possible, any case can go either way, because you could have all the evidence against someone but the jury/judge, depending on the case, could just say innocent. However normal people of the jury aren't retarded. Usually when this happens it is racism.
Yes anything is possible, any case can go either way, because you could have all the evidence against someone but the jury/judge, depending on the case, could just say innocent. However normal people of the jury aren't retarded. Usually when this happens it is racism.
That's the thing tho, there is no test for the intellectual capacity of the jury. Some of them are very nearly "retarded" as you say.
Yes i do, if you are mentally able and no obvious hindering aspects are present, then the only way to not be in the jury is unfair objectivity (or if you have previous crimes on record). That means that people that are literally mentally handicapped can (and have been) accepted to be presented as a member of the jury.
Ergo, people can be "retarded" enough (as you say) to make a bad decision, ergo, anything is possible, which is my only point.
Yes i do, if you are mentally able and no obvious hindering aspects are present, then the only way to not be in the jury is unfair objectivity (or if you have previous crimes on record). That means that people that are literally mentally handicapped can (and have been) accepted to be presented as a member of the jury.
Ergo, people can be "retarded" enough (as you say) to make a bad decision, ergo, anything is possible, which is my only point.
It's extremely uncommon and I do think a case has ever happened that all 12 (Technically 13) were mentally handicapped.
Reminds me of the time a some guy on the TF2 forums wanted to sew Valve over virtual hats.
Perfect!
Well the thing is, anyone rich enough to find a lawyer good enough to win such a weak case wouldn't be suing. Infact you almost virtually have no case, I don't think any lawyer could win that case.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumYes anything is possible, any case can go either way, because you could have all the evidence against someone but the jury/judge, depending on the case, could just say innocent. However normal people of the jury aren't retarded. Usually when this happens it is racism.
inb4 lock :biggrin.gif:
/endthread
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumThat's the thing tho, there is no test for the intellectual capacity of the jury. Some of them are very nearly "retarded" as you say.
You also don't seem to understand how the people of the jury are picked.
You are having a hilarious post ping pong.
Go debate in your pms... (looks like pms)
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumVoter registration and drivers license. I actually know what im talking about here...
You do know there is also an interview right?
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumYes i do, if you are mentally able and no obvious hindering aspects are present, then the only way to not be in the jury is unfair objectivity (or if you have previous crimes on record). That means that people that are literally mentally handicapped can (and have been) accepted to be presented as a member of the jury.
Ergo, people can be "retarded" enough (as you say) to make a bad decision, ergo, anything is possible, which is my only point.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Curse PremiumIt's extremely uncommon and I do think a case has ever happened that all 12 (Technically 13) were mentally handicapped.
Also yeah continue the thread lol