Fire Sword: Crafting - Bottom middle = Flint & Steel, Middle = Coal, Top middle = Coal
Damage: 8 Hearts
*Takes 350 Hits to lose
*When wet, the sword becomes an Iron sword until it leaves the water or exits the rain
*Has a 20% chance of lighting targets on fire when hit.
*Not recommended in wooden buildings
Fire Sword: Crafting - Bottom middle = Flint & Steel, Middle = Coal, Top middle = Coal
Damage: 8 Hearts
*Takes 350 Hits to lose
*When wet, the sword becomes an Iron sword until it leaves the water or exits the rain
*Has a 20% chance of lighting targets on fire when hit.
*Not recommended in wooden buildings
New swords...Swords....SwordS...Plural...One suggestion...Wut.
On topic: it seems a bit too simple to create -- you would only need one iron. I think it may be a neat suggestion if it required netherrack or something slightly more challenging to obtain.
He always wins. And change the name. I was expecting multiple well fleshed out sword ideas, but instead I got a single idea that was mediocre at best. Oerhaps. " Another Take on the Ridicously Oversuggested Fire Sword" would do.
Fire Sword: Crafting - Bottom middle = Flint & Steel, Middle = Coal, Top middle = Coal
Damage: 8 Hearts
*Takes 350 Hits to lose
*When wet, the sword becomes an Iron sword until it leaves the water or exits the rain
*Has a 20% chance of lighting targets on fire when hit.
*Not recommended in wooden buildings
The problem is it would be too unbalanced in the game. Does more damage than a diamond sword and is cheaper to make than iron, gold or diamond. Seems to be very long lasting as well. Its not a good idea suggesting a new item that basically make 3 existing ones redundant. Perhaps think about reducing its heart damage to less than 5 so it still takes 3 hits to kill hostile mobs. If you think about how long it takes zombies and skeletons to die after they've been set on fire by the sun it not a big stretch to imagine a fire sword would take 3 hits to kill them also, even if it did set them on fire, after all, how lethal is jabbing someone with a lit coal sword going to be? surely not as lethal as the diamond sword.
Damage: 8 Hearts
*Takes 350 Hits to lose
*When wet, the sword becomes an Iron sword until it leaves the water or exits the rain
*Has a 20% chance of lighting targets on fire when hit.
*Not recommended in wooden buildings
New swords...Swords....SwordS...Plural...One suggestion...Wut.
Also, crappy idea.
Incompetence is a plague. I am the cure.
For all your wolf suggestion needs, I present the WOLF MEGATHREAD!
Stories: A Miner's Chronicle, The Lost Chronicle [Entries 32-2, 33-1, and 33-2 out!]
Do you reallly need to call it a crappy idea? Just say you don't like it and be done.
Better idea: How about I call it crap, which I have a right to do, and YOU be done?
Incompetence is a plague. I am the cure.
For all your wolf suggestion needs, I present the WOLF MEGATHREAD!
Stories: A Miner's Chronicle, The Lost Chronicle [Entries 32-2, 33-1, and 33-2 out!]
Because then you sound like a jack ass.
Dude... chill...
No, then I sound like an asshole and a jerk, both of which I gladly admit to being.
Incompetence is a plague. I am the cure.
For all your wolf suggestion needs, I present the WOLF MEGATHREAD!
Stories: A Miner's Chronicle, The Lost Chronicle [Entries 32-2, 33-1, and 33-2 out!]
Just add him to your ignore list.
On topic: it seems a bit too simple to create -- you would only need one iron. I think it may be a neat suggestion if it required netherrack or something slightly more challenging to obtain.
- sunperp
agreed tenfold. he usually has the right idea, thought he likes to be a bit... rough?
After being around on the forums a while, you realize that nobody listens to you unless, a. you support the idea or b. act like a jack ass.
Sig made by llama66613
Follow me on twitter
sig'd
by the way, swordS only one idea, several times posted by others
I'd sig this but the new forum's sig limits are the dumbest ****in thing in this place.
Incompetence is a plague. I am the cure.
For all your wolf suggestion needs, I present the WOLF MEGATHREAD!
Stories: A Miner's Chronicle, The Lost Chronicle [Entries 32-2, 33-1, and 33-2 out!]
The problem is it would be too unbalanced in the game. Does more damage than a diamond sword and is cheaper to make than iron, gold or diamond. Seems to be very long lasting as well. Its not a good idea suggesting a new item that basically make 3 existing ones redundant. Perhaps think about reducing its heart damage to less than 5 so it still takes 3 hits to kill hostile mobs. If you think about how long it takes zombies and skeletons to die after they've been set on fire by the sun it not a big stretch to imagine a fire sword would take 3 hits to kill them also, even if it did set them on fire, after all, how lethal is jabbing someone with a lit coal sword going to be? surely not as lethal as the diamond sword.