Mine would be hand made as well, but thought that to be a bit over kill on category numbers xD
I'm thinking of re-wording my descriptions of each category, because some people seem to misinterpret the categories. The hand made section is already opened up into packs I wasn't anticipating, I intended packs like 42's Intrigue to be in the hand made section and re-evaluated my decision to allow packs like Red Roses to go in since the noise, dithering and similar features are done without any filters, and that is uncommon. The packs like Glendale and BiTLY wouldn't fall under that category because they aren't as far into the hand made as I want, and I need to keep it organized into specific categories otherwise each pack will be in nearly every section and one would be better off using the TPC. Keeping the categories specific is necessary to maintaining the actual purpose of the thread, so I will be a bit strict in the hand made section. As such, BiTLY and Glendale will have the categories they are already in, but won't be in the hand made category.
So... Taiine pretty much summed that up.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Fare well everyone! My time to retire has come! "And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
You need a small icon we can use to link back to :3
I'm not sure what you mean... But I'll just do all of it.
Do you mean a link to the top of the first post from the bottom? Or did you mean an icon that people could put on their threads to link here? I like both, so I'll just do both. I have an idea for an icon right now.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Fare well everyone! My time to retire has come! "And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
Well since it's visible again, and I now have a published Texture Pack...
Name of your pack: "Sanity" Pack creator: Alvoria Pack theme: Improved Default, Hand Made, Fantasy Pack resolution: 16x Link to thread: goo.gl/MNJLF Mod support: Full Display image (320x320):
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
8/15/2012
Posts:
1,652
Minecraft:
SingedFeathers
Member Details
Ohh, forgot about this thread.
My Pack's page link needs to be updated to the one
in my sig though, don't need anyone coming along and
Necroposting on the old WIP one
I fail to see how it is "improved default". I was thinking more of default edits (good ones) and faithful packs for that category, whereas your pack seems to have non-faithful original design textures.
I fail to see how it is "improved default". I was thinking more of default edits (good ones) and faithful packs for that category, whereas your pack seems to have non-faithful original design textures.
*shrug*
My understanding of "Improved Default" was that it has a vanilla-ish theme to it. Wood looks like wood, leaves like leaves, enchanting tables like enchanting tables... ect. Just, you know, better.
Your thread your rules, though. I'll go by whatever definition you'd care to use for how you do your categories. No worries.
My understanding of "Improved Default" was that it has a vanilla-ish theme to it. Wood looks like wood, leaves like leaves, enchanting tables like enchanting tables... ect. Just, you know, better.
Your thread your rules, though. I'll go by whatever definition you'd care to use for how you do your categories. No worries.
Thank you!
Yeah, I see your point, but the same could be said about most packs. The planks are planks, they are listed as planks, and are made with wood, so they would inevitably look like planks, as with most other blocks. I just need to be strict (as much as I would prefer not to be), so I don't have all packs in too many categories. I need them to be specific, or it isn't very helpful compared to the TPC. Sorry, I really hate to tell people they can't put the packs where they want, but I need to keep it specific.
Should probably also change to title of the thread so that people know it was updated this year.
I also voted, btw. I don't think there's enough activity to warrant a pack of the month, though I'd love it if that changed so I were wrong.
Both fixed.
I forgot about the date in the title, and I have a lot of packs out right now that I am working on, so with this not being that popular, I just keep putting the pack-of-the-month off (I'm a slacker, sometimes). I put a message in it's place so I can fill it in next month. It's kind-of a waste of time this late in this month. I am hoping it will grow in popularity soon too.
I forgot about the date in the title, and I have a lot of packs out right now that I am working on, so with this not being that popular, I just keep putting the pack-of-the-month off (I'm a slacker, sometimes). I put a message in it's place so I can fill it in next month. It's kind-of a waste of time this late in this month. I am hoping it will grow in popularity soon too.
Corner, I'm going to be honest with you. You need to maybe disconinue a few packs and finish one at a time. It's obviously too much of a strain to do like 4 packs at once. That's what I would do, atleast. Just saying.
Corner, I'm going to be honest with you. You need to maybe disconinue a few packs and finish one at a time. It's obviously too much of a strain to do like 4 packs at once. That's what I would do, atleast. Just saying.
I have a lot more than I have released, and honestly, I have so many packs because I get bored of things very quickly, so in order to give my best work, I kind-of need to jump around different styles (themes, resolutions, etc), so I'm not working on one type at a time. It really isn't the packs that are eating away at most of my time, that is courtesy of school and schoolwork, but I have a lot I want and like to do in the time I do have, so I don't think discontinuing any would be beneficial enough to bother. Updating packs after not keeping it up-to-date isn't a great process, but it is much easier to keep ahead of it. I appreciate the concern, but thinking of what would be best with all things considered, I think I will just maintain as I have, since I haven't had many problems so far, and the ones I have had aren't anything that some ambition wouldn't help.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Fare well everyone! My time to retire has come! "And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
I am hereby bumping this thread by reason of... it's a good thread. *shrug*
OK, I do have an alternator motive. Corner_g, will you please update the images for "Sanity"? With today's Minecraft update I've published a new version of the pack, and the screen shots are now inaccurate and it's killing my OCD to have them displayed.
I am hereby bumping this thread by reason of... it's a good thread. *shrug*
OK, I do have an alternator motive. Corner_g, will you please update the images for "Sanity"? With today's Minecraft update I've published a new version of the pack, and the screen shots are now inaccurate and it's killing my OCD to have them displayed.
I'm thinking of re-wording my descriptions of each category, because some people seem to misinterpret the categories. The hand made section is already opened up into packs I wasn't anticipating, I intended packs like 42's Intrigue to be in the hand made section and re-evaluated my decision to allow packs like Red Roses to go in since the noise, dithering and similar features are done without any filters, and that is uncommon. The packs like Glendale and BiTLY wouldn't fall under that category because they aren't as far into the hand made as I want, and I need to keep it organized into specific categories otherwise each pack will be in nearly every section and one would be better off using the TPC. Keeping the categories specific is necessary to maintaining the actual purpose of the thread, so I will be a bit strict in the hand made section. As such, BiTLY and Glendale will have the categories they are already in, but won't be in the hand made category.
So... Taiine pretty much summed that up.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
I'm not sure what you mean... But I'll just do all of it.
Do you mean a link to the top of the first post from the bottom? Or did you mean an icon that people could put on their threads to link here? I like both, so I'll just do both. I have an idea for an icon right now.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
Edit: I remade the icon now! It looks better. I'm no pixel artist like Peyton, so it isn't as good as his IPC logo, but this should suffice.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
These forums are dumb and break my links. I'm bubbleawsome on steam too.
Hmm... They work for me. It may be because of the mobile, but if that's the case, unfortunately, I don't think I can fix that.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
Well since it's visible again, and I now have a published Texture Pack...
Name of your pack: "Sanity"
Pack creator: Alvoria
Pack theme: Improved Default, Hand Made, Fantasy
Pack resolution: 16x
Link to thread: goo.gl/MNJLF
Mod support: Full
Display image (320x320):
Preview: Preview Image
Thank you for accepting my humble application.
My Pack's page link needs to be updated to the one
in my sig though, don't need anyone coming along and
Necroposting on the old WIP one
I fail to see how it is "improved default". I was thinking more of default edits (good ones) and faithful packs for that category, whereas your pack seems to have non-faithful original design textures.
I'll add it in the other categories, though.
If people even use this.
I'll fix.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
My understanding of "Improved Default" was that it has a vanilla-ish theme to it. Wood looks like wood, leaves like leaves, enchanting tables like enchanting tables... ect. Just, you know, better.
Your thread your rules, though. I'll go by whatever definition you'd care to use for how you do your categories. No worries.
Thank you!
I've been here for a loooooooooong time.
Yeah, I see your point, but the same could be said about most packs. The planks are planks, they are listed as planks, and are made with wood, so they would inevitably look like planks, as with most other blocks. I just need to be strict (as much as I would prefer not to be), so I don't have all packs in too many categories. I need them to be specific, or it isn't very helpful compared to the TPC. Sorry, I really hate to tell people they can't put the packs where they want, but I need to keep it specific.
Your welcome for the add, by the way.
Thanks! I had that up for some time now, but never worked on any of them... I guess I'd better actually do something.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
I also voted, btw. I don't think there's enough activity to warrant a pack of the month, though I'd love it if that changed so I were wrong.
Both fixed.
I forgot about the date in the title, and I have a lot of packs out right now that I am working on, so with this not being that popular, I just keep putting the pack-of-the-month off (I'm a slacker, sometimes). I put a message in it's place so I can fill it in next month. It's kind-of a waste of time this late in this month. I am hoping it will grow in popularity soon too.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
Corner, I'm going to be honest with you. You need to maybe disconinue a few packs and finish one at a time. It's obviously too much of a strain to do like 4 packs at once. That's what I would do, atleast. Just saying.
I've been here for a loooooooooong time.
I have a lot more than I have released, and honestly, I have so many packs because I get bored of things very quickly, so in order to give my best work, I kind-of need to jump around different styles (themes, resolutions, etc), so I'm not working on one type at a time. It really isn't the packs that are eating away at most of my time, that is courtesy of school and schoolwork, but I have a lot I want and like to do in the time I do have, so I don't think discontinuing any would be beneficial enough to bother. Updating packs after not keeping it up-to-date isn't a great process, but it is much easier to keep ahead of it. I appreciate the concern, but thinking of what would be best with all things considered, I think I will just maintain as I have, since I haven't had many problems so far, and the ones I have had aren't anything that some ambition wouldn't help.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
OK, I do have an alternator motive. Corner_g, will you please update the images for "Sanity"? With today's Minecraft update I've published a new version of the pack, and the screen shots are now inaccurate and it's killing my OCD to have them displayed.
Logo Image: http://i.imgur.com/UPvEPAI.png
Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/v8kNJ.jpg
Thank you!
Okay, it's fixed! Let me know if I missed one, or it doesn't work.
"And with that, POW! I'm gone." ---Lord Crump
Here's the correct one: http://i.imgur.com/xUbkD48