That depends on what you mean by max. How many monitors, what resolution, whether or not you have full AA settings, and what fps you consider max are all factors to consider.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Quote from TheFieldZy »
Nobody's perfect, so neither is Hannah Montana Linux, but it's pretty great.
Quote from BC_Programming on Operating Systems »
They all suck. They just suck differently. Sort of like prostitutes.
If my AMD 6700 can run it on max with a medium end processor (AMD athlon x4), then why can't this?
because it isn't possible, you need a gtx 580 or a 7950 to max it, my 6850 cannot max skyrim except with the textures lower, and once the explosions start going it will be a lagg fest, plus there is no way your playing it at 1920x1080 with that card, it cannot be done
see how low the 6870 is? yours is below that, and this was with an i5 2500k, overclocked to 4ghz. there is no way in heck your Athlon can do the same
That depends on what you mean by max. How many monitors, what resolution, whether or not you have full AA settings, and what fps you consider max are all factors to consider.
1. One Monitor
2. 1080p HD (if I answered this wrong tell me)
3. Most likely Yes.
4. Not quite sure how it is laid out but about 60 FPS. Anything that isn't lag.
1. One Monitor
2. 1080p HD (if I answered this wrong tell me)
3. Most likely Yes.
4. Not quite sure how it is laid out but about 60 FPS. Anything that isn't lag.
I don't know...
Ashamed Face
Would it be too big of a decrease? I don't want to lose too much of the experience playing the game.
nah, you should be able to get atleast 30 ish, maybe turn AF/AA down a bit
Pretty much what you said...
Assuming you have a good processor.
http://raptr.com/UrbanNinja6?src=em_gamesm" target=""
OK That answers my question! Thanks! :cool.gif:
pretty much anything on max, except bf3 >.> that will need some lowered settings
i5-4690K @4.6GHz ~ ASRock Z97X Fatal1ty Killer ~ EKWB Supremacy MX ~ Watercooled SLI STRIX 970s
Project RedShift
You mean ''Most Definitely''? For a second I thought you were calling me shy and unconfident. :sad.gif:
If my AMD 6700 can run it on max with a medium end processor (AMD athlon x4), then why can't this?
because it isn't possible, you need a gtx 580 or a 7950 to max it, my 6850 cannot max skyrim except with the textures lower, and once the explosions start going it will be a lagg fest, plus there is no way your playing it at 1920x1080 with that card, it cannot be done
see how low the 6870 is? yours is below that, and this was with an i5 2500k, overclocked to 4ghz. there is no way in heck your Athlon can do the same
i5-4690K @4.6GHz ~ ASRock Z97X Fatal1ty Killer ~ EKWB Supremacy MX ~ Watercooled SLI STRIX 970s
Project RedShift
1. One Monitor
2. 1080p HD (if I answered this wrong tell me)
3. Most likely Yes.
4. Not quite sure how it is laid out but about 60 FPS. Anything that isn't lag.
I don't know...
Ashamed Face
Would it be too big of a decrease? I don't want to lose too much of the experience playing the game.
nah, you should be able to get atleast 30 ish, maybe turn AF/AA down a bit
i5-4690K @4.6GHz ~ ASRock Z97X Fatal1ty Killer ~ EKWB Supremacy MX ~ Watercooled SLI STRIX 970s
Project RedShift
If this guy uses 1440x900 or lower monitor then it's easily possible at around 30-40 FPS.