Owing to interesting events last night, the Minecraft EULA - in particular, where it pertains to multiplayer servers - has become a very hot topic. So what's all the fuss about? Why is this even a thing right now? Bebopvox gives a pretty solid breakdown of the situation, both from the perspective of Mojang, and the community at large.
PLEASE NOTE:
Some key points about the situation, in TL;DR format:
- Has the EULA changed? - No, not yet
- Is Mojang shutting down servers? - No
- Are there talks about finding a middle ground with server owners and Mojang? - Yes
Everyone is now freaking out as if Mojang is about to feed all the puppies in the world through a blender to ensure that no one else can ever kill a puppy ever again.
LOGIC \o/
Please shed some light on me and what did i get wrong, even if the numbers are 10 times less it's still way too much. (care to show me the exact numbers?)
Minecraft was mostly marketed for free by the community as much as i know, so their marketing costs should be low.
Community is mostly what made minecraft a success, they only provided us with the game.
If you think it's fair that a company makes so much then good for you, but at least they shouldn't crap on their customers whenever they want to.
If you want to call me ignorant and misinformed at least point me to where that truth is you speak off, otherwise you are wasting your time, i won't change my opinion because you think i'm ignorant.
" You are in no position to spout nonsense about "greed" when you have no basic knowledge of marketing dynamics."
Supply and demand, what's there to not know? The current economic system is a fail but we currently can't make anything better. People getting overpayed for doing nothing and people not getting payed at all for working their butts off is no news to me. I'm just outraged when i think about it and how unfair it is.
I really hope mojang cracks down on the EULA and ToS in a way that stops servers from selling stuff. The mods/addons/plugins are owned by the game developers for most games out there. Why do people that make third party content make money off something that mojang should technically own?
Interesting. I did a quick check and found a few attempts at "Change" with some similar wording.
Sweet, it inspired me to make Please ignore the "Change the EULA" and the like requests. "https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/mojang-please-ignore-the-change-the-eula-and-the-like-requests"
Please read it and sign it if you agree.
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
- Evelyn Beatrice Hall aka "S.G. Tallentyre" (quote often misattributed to Voltaire)
Explain in bullet points why what they are going to do (do you even know what they are going to do?) is stupid?
I pity the ignorance of you people.
minecraftsurvivalgames.com
http://hypixel.net/
forum.hivemc.com
www.mineplex.com
roxbot.com
TheCoreMC
Are trust-worthy...
Read Photoshop EULA to find out. But i guess you would say it isn't valid anyway.
But EULA are valid.
Think of books as example. You can buy those. But more often than not, you can't sell without giving a part to the author. Applies in the music industry, too. (of course, depends on contracts terms, exactly like EULA)
For software, you are often simply denied the right to sell it yourself, hence "End User" start of the name.
User, not seller of the game or any part of it.
Notch himself stated that He wanted server owners to be able to make money like it was said in the video. Now how this is going to come across is not known but I have experience with the baddies. They are usually Youtuber affiliated servers too. I used to play on this server called SGCPVP and it was absurd. People were paying 50-400 dollars every day for pay to win privileges. This is the kind of thing that mojang clearly does NOT want. What I think is going to happen, is that greedy pay-to-win servers are going to have to give up a lot of things or else be shut down. I see nothing wrong with selling in game content as long as it seems fair, not out of greed and put towards a server and its hard working staff. Of course this is against the MTOS but at this point it is down to the ethics of the entire thing.
Sort of like the Tribunal in League. Or whatever it is. But a playerbase, with authority, to enforce a fair compensation standard.
I respectfully disagree - there should never be any users or anyone else with any kind of authority to enforce anything over any of the other users, with the sole exception of the game's developers, and even then, only to a limited extent such as enforcing their EULA or ToS, whatever those end up being.
If people are willing to pay ridiculous amounts of money for digital items, or anything, well, it's their money and their decision, in my opinion. Are the server owners being unethical in their marketing and 'products'? Probably, but no one is forcing anyone to buy it. Play on a different server, play single player, play a different game, heck, learn a real life freaking skill or get a job, anything. The choice is yours and yours alone what you do with your time and your money.
As for kids nicking their parents' credit cards, that's the parents' problem. Sounds like it's time to ban Minecraft / computer games for that kid and get them outside or into another hobby, or whatever form of repercussion the parents decide is appropriate for such actions. Let each and every person take responsibility for the choices that they have made, rather than try to shift blame onto Mojang or other parties. If you fall into a hole, next time look where you are <censored> walking.
Exactly. I am going to agree with your post. If only I could up vote... Ran out of up votes...
But seriously, pay to win games are just absurd. Basically, Notch is ok with server owners making profits, but not large profits for pay to win situations.
Nowhere in the Photoshop EULA doesn't it state that you cannot make money from selling pictures edited or painted in their program.
This is also a classic example of a false analogy logical fallacy. There is no way that Minecraft and Photoshop could be compared in this scenario.
Exactly this.
Your example would make more sense if it went like this:
"That would be like purchasing photoshop, then charging other users to edit their photos on your pc, using photoshops program"
See the difference.
I exactly agree. Of course, they may still get angry calls from parents, but if a kid charged like $40 instead of like $1000, it would be a bit less dramatic.
*Just an opinion don't kill me*
Life is a double edged sword. It cuts you going either way.
Thank you, someone who I can agree with. A lot of the problems seem to be coming up from some bad parenting issues :\ - but unfortunately, it doesn't matter in this day an age. Parents who spoil their kids will get mad at the people who appear to take the money, which to them is just the name of Minecraft, or Mojang.
Ok to start of with, Mojang hasn't said or attempted anything and aren't preventing people from making a dime. They intend to find a middle ground, which personally doesn't sound very feasible, but hey at least they are not going out right and shutting everyone down yet. You make it sound like they've already done so.
Also, your argument about how Mojang has no right, is horrible invalid. You bought the game and agreed to their ToS and EULA. Meaning anything you make you are already aware that you are not supposed to many any money off of it at all. And even if "you don't care" what it says, it really doesn't matter because you agreed to it, and honestly if you plan to go to court of not caring about something you agreed to, good luck.
Lastly, the EULA is something you've agreed to, and there is no getting around it. Mod makers, map makers, server owners, or others who build on the game are all aware (or at least should be since they agreed to it) of the EULA. There is nothing absurd about any of it, and comparing Mojang's EULA to other companies is just stupid because the EULA can be written differently for any software. Sure it gives the company the power to make their own laws, but you do have the choice to not agree to it and go elsewhere.
Nothing happens, I garuntee that every single server that has donation perks also has their own agreement or statement about it being non-refundable and that the compensation may be changed or removed at any time with or without warning. You can't sue against things you agree to, and if you don't agree then don't buy it. Plus, no one is going to buy a lawyer over anything that is under 5 grand, it would cost way more for the lawyer in the end and you end up poorer.
This idea of a cap is compeltely dumb. What if I had several very reasonable 20 dollar packages that were fair, and then I wanted to make a bundle price of 50 of the packages for 800 dollars. In the end the package is much cheaper for each in the bundle and the cap rule is no longer useful. It really isn't about the money being spent, but what the server gives in return.
If a game has a bunch of kits they should in theory be balanced kits. This allows for variety when donating, but no benefit. Unbalanced kits create a pay to win server, and sometimes it isn't even intentional. So really the change that needs to happen it making the power of kits fairly equal and at least attempt balancing issues (which in any game are never perfect). Big servers like Mineplex actually do this fairly well. You can still win with the default kits, but you can pay for more variety and still be equally matched.
--------------
On another note. This whole thing was started by comment made in chats by a developer voicing his opinion. While I think voicing opinions is a good thing, you really should not listen to anything that isn't an official PR statement, especially from developers like Grum, who really loves his voice in chats. In my opinion he seems to really like having the authority and makes it very clear by giving statements like the ones he did.
Also, when it comes to complaints from parents to Mojang, it is unfortunate but they really need to take actions to prevent them. Eventually it could add up, even though it really is the parents fault for letting their kid buy such outrageous things with their money.
Anyways, hopefully we can get an official statement and a more black and white way of seeing things and how to go about them. In any case, it will be extremely hard to enforce on just the bad servers, and Mojang has its work cut out for them.