I didn't know you were the maker of the realistic texture pack! That is awesome, and I like your updates. I haven't updated since... I dunno, your first release? I'll have to download this when I can.
Just posted on your topic too - but I didn't know you were the maker of the Realistic Texture Pack! That is awesome, and the one I'm currently using. I have to PM you about something.
You uh... might want to wash that so it doesn't get warty.
That sucks - I know how easy it is to fly through your filesize limit, especially if you have a fast connection. I too, supposedly have a filesize limit (never really asked my wife, she set it up while I was deployed) - but the connection is so horribly crap that I don't think I could ever get close to reaching it.
And then, imagine the power of that with dual or quad cores. It's just sickening to think about.
My first computer was a 486/66 MHz. SIXTY SIX. Now we're at 9100 MHz (well, the average still being about 3000 MHz, but with multiple cores). That's quite a jump, and it's amazing to look back on what was realistic amazing graphics compared to what we have today.
That is very exciting news! Have you heard about the 1 TB DVD-like discs? They've found a new way to store data on them. Probably won't see that for about the same amount of time, with blu-ray taking so much of the spotlight right now. But eventually, all those blu-ray discs are going to be obsolete as well.
Quatro - Why wouldn't it? Your GPU just uses a processor similar to your main, but on a smaller scale. If they've figured out how to run a chip at that frequency... Wow, the possibilities.
I wonder if anyone has calculated that? There should be a prog (or if you already know how) to keep track of the amount of traffic on your computer. I would host a server, invite one other person and just run around and play for an hour or more. Multiply that number by the number of hours / people that will be playing, and you should have a pretty good estimate.
0
0
0
Koolwitak, I'll have to look at yours also.
0
0
0
0
Joey mailed me some new letters - but I have to scan them. In the meantime...
0
ARRRRR! *chomp*
You uh... might want to wash that so it doesn't get warty.
That sucks - I know how easy it is to fly through your filesize limit, especially if you have a fast connection. I too, supposedly have a filesize limit (never really asked my wife, she set it up while I was deployed) - but the connection is so horribly crap that I don't think I could ever get close to reaching it.
0
0
And then, imagine the power of that with dual or quad cores. It's just sickening to think about.
My first computer was a 486/66 MHz. SIXTY SIX. Now we're at 9100 MHz (well, the average still being about 3000 MHz, but with multiple cores). That's quite a jump, and it's amazing to look back on what was realistic amazing graphics compared to what we have today.
That is very exciting news! Have you heard about the 1 TB DVD-like discs? They've found a new way to store data on them. Probably won't see that for about the same amount of time, with blu-ray taking so much of the spotlight right now. But eventually, all those blu-ray discs are going to be obsolete as well.
Quatro - Why wouldn't it? Your GPU just uses a processor similar to your main, but on a smaller scale. If they've figured out how to run a chip at that frequency... Wow, the possibilities.
0
0
You could uh... make one?
0
EDIT: You have to pay for bandwidth? :sad.gif:
0
I like it - the default grass thing is kind of weird. Also, you apparently increased the resolution from the default? Looks good. Thanks for sharing.
0