All users will need to merge their Minecraft Forum account with a new or existing Twitch account starting October 23rd. You can merge your accounts by clicking here. Have questions? Learn more here.
Dismiss
  • 0

    posted a message on New water physics announced at Minecon Earth

    What's next? every blocks will have gravity in it? Iron blocks becomes rusty overtime?

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on New water physics announced at Minecon Earth

    I'm not bothered by it. Sure, it'll take getting used to because you can no longer rely on stairs and signs to keep you safe, but that also makes things more realistic and opens up new possibilities.

    How does making the game more realistic a good thing? Realism < Gameplay. And can you explain on how breaking countless farms opened up more possibilities? This feature limits them.


    I actually like it. I have always wanted to place fence underwater, but it just looks so dumb. Can only use full blocks. People will always make new farm designs. Nothing to worry about

    Except that no one cares about underwater build. They are breaking water and ruining the game just so a developer can put shipwrecks underwater without airblocks.


    It fixes one of the most irritating design features in the game, allowing us to build better underwater and with water (and lava I'm guessing) in general. The drawback of breaking some contraptions is a heavy price to pay but it's worth it in my mind. Besides, building contraptions is all about ingenuity and evolving design, so I'm sure people will come up with some way around any issue. There's even been talk of Mojang adding-in a new, valve-like block that'd serve as a replacement for old signs, trapdoors, etc. .

    Quasi-connectivity is also an "irritating game design" and the community finds a way to use it. There are so many irritating game design in Minecraft but guess what? it what makes Minecraft a very unique game.

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 1

    posted a message on Bed changes in the snapshot, yay or nay?

    I've watched several videos regarding changes and features added to the game and one of them frightened me.

    The change of bed where now it cannot be placed on top of air blocks.

    These changes made what previously made beds to become a revolutionary building material (parasol for example) to something very boring which is just a bed.

    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New water physics announced at Minecon Earth

    After seeing the Minecon earth livestream. Something has bothered me. The new water physics. In case you didn't know, this means that water will now run through fences and other blocks that doesn't fill the "gap". With this water physics, it will break so many mob farms and other things.


    Let me know what are your thoughts

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on Does the existence of other platform in Minecraft harms the java version of the game

    I am quite concerned because with Microsoft prioritizing other platform in terms of development. This could mean Java edition update would be slown, or even stopped. And if other platform were to never exist, then the java version (the version we all love) will still be developed normally.

    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on No Crossplay for Java?!

    It's just another step for Microsoft to "popularize" their Marketplace

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on Commands are broken and dead in 1.13

    I found the changes in the command to be quite unnecessary. I mean seriously, what do we get from disabling numerical gamemode to letter.

    Sometimes, i don't understand Mojang.

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on So there's good news, and then REALLY concerning news...
    Quote from Mastermined»

    No, they're bundling them together in a new game with a stronger, more polished engine that is easier for them to work on and performs better than Minecraft Java overall.

    Minecraft Java is far from a masterpiece, and becomes slower and more bloated with every new update. It was never built to be a big and succesful game, and it is slowly starting to show that. Building a new and better version of Minecraft allows Mojang to continue working on the game, without it becoming completely unplayable.

    If you have a PC that has trouble running Minecraft Java smoothly, try Minecraft WIndows 10 Edition once, to see how much better that performs.

    Go play our much better edition of Minecraft, because the pocket edition is much more eye-goughing"polished".
    The community is just as great, as long as you're under 9.
    Oh and don't worry about downloading maps, buy them instead with coins like in many crappy mobile games! It's a great change in a better direction!
    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on So there's good news, and then REALLY concerning news...

    This makes me wants do drink someone else's vomit, i mean seriously? why Mojang?

    The role model of MC that all platforms followed, is now becoming a lesser prioritized edition?

    They should not rename this. Java is OG and always will be superior because Java is much easier to develop with (and always will be).

    Therefore most new content will be with the Java version plus those who play Java are the part of the community who give the most input about the game. We can see there are so many great creations like quarks, crazy craft, etc in Java unlike the bedrock edition.


    Those who plays the inferior edition are probably casuals, noobs, or doesn't know the existence of Java edition in the first place.


    I guess this was all about the corrupt company who just wants money, even if it means treating the fanbase like garbage.

    Well, Rip real minecraft.

    Posted in: Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on What are your guys opinion of the rebranding of PC Minecraft to "Minecraft: Java Edition"?

    This is just another step to make Java edition less focused and the devs supported more on the inferior version to get that sweet marketplace money.

    Should've named it Minecraft: superior and free from microsoft microtransaction edition.

    Posted in: Recent Updates and Snapshots
  • 0

    posted a message on Change the Java Minecraft name.
    Quote from C1ff»


    That's a nice Conspiracy Theory you got there. Care to give us any proof, and not just insults? (As much as I dislike companies with little passion or moral for their work too, shouting, swearing and insults are the results of having no arguments to give.)



    Well, Microsoft ruined the company Rareware by buying their company. Link

    They also ruined LinkedIn. Link

    And they also ruined Skype. Link

    So i highly doubt Microsoft won't screw this game.


    Heck Microsoft are even the ones who did controversial things to Minecraft which could be a sign to the franchise demise:

    1. Notch left Mojang

    2. controversial updates (like 1.9 combat which no one asked for)

    3. how lacklustre the update become (cough... 1.10)

    4. Minecraft story mode which is just a terrible cash grab for Microsoft

    5. the Marketplace (oh hey! you got a content that was for free in java. Well guess what, Microsoft is greedy enough to make them PAID)

    6. server blacklisting (seriously microsoft? arkham network was a good server. Oh well, they made a custom launcher which bypass the blacklist. screw you microsoft. you deserved it.)

    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on Change the Java Minecraft name.

    That's just one of Microsoft first step to kill off the Java version so the community would move on to the crossplay edition which... guess what?

    has the "community" marketplace. I wouldn't be surprised if they banned maps and mods distribution without paying Microsoft.

    This is the reason why i hated Microsoft bought Mojang. They're just a greedy company who squeezed a franchise and then throw it in the garbage.

    Good bye Minecraft, you'll suffer the same fate as Rareware.

    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 0

    posted a message on The ultimate solution for the texture change
    Quote from Mastermined»

    If they were gonna make it optional, why make the change to begin with? That's just stupid planning and programming.

    I got good news for you though, this is something you can do yourself! just make a copy of your 1.12 Minecraft folder, and paste all the textures into a resource pack. And boom, you will never have to face the horrifying reality of someone changing a minor thing in a video game ever again!


    But what if you're building in a server? or what if a YouTuber will use this pack and you have to watch them use those horrible realistic vanilla wannabe pack. I don't think this texture change is needed for the game, i hate changes.
    Posted in: Suggestions
  • 1

    posted a message on combat in 1.9 good or bad?

    Minecraft combat should be very intense and fast paced instead of lazy grandpa system which makes you block shield all the time.

    Posted in: Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Sapphire Suggestion (Not just another tools)

    This is the reason of why adding new gem or basically ore or metal to the game won't work.

    Posted in: Suggestions
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.