So me and my friend are having a discussion whether SLI or Crossfire is the best choice. Personally i'm leaning more to wards Crossfire, since I have better experience from it. SLI though... I have never touched it as I have only heard bad things about it.
Say... How would three Geforce GTX 570's stand against three Radeon HD 6970's?
I'm aware that the manufacturer does play a role, but just imagine that it's the stock one : P
I used two HD5770's in CF a few months ago, which gave me a little performance boost but mainly games that were optimized for crossfire ran great on it.
So me and my friend are having a discussion whether SLI or Crossfire is the best choice. Personally i'm leaning more to wards Crossfire, since I have better experience from it. SLI though... I have never touched it as I have only heard bad things about it.
Say... How would three Geforce GTX 570's stand against three Radeon HD 6970's?
I'm aware that the manufacturer does play a role, but just imagine that it's the stock one : P
It is mostly dependent upon the cards being used and whether or not the game you are playing allows multi-gpu rendering.
SLI does require an "SLI certified" motherboard, whereas CrossFireX just requires two cards that fit.
Say... How would three Geforce GTX 570's stand against three Radeon HD 6970's?
I'm aware that the manufacturer does play a role, but just imagine that it's the stock one : P
No ordinary consumer has that much money >.>
But in general, NVIDIA's SLI is probably superior. We all know that AMD are very bad with drivers.
It is mostly dependent upon the cards being used and whether or not the game you are playing allows multi-gpu rendering.
SLI does require an "SLI certified" motherboard, whereas CrossFireX just requires two cards that fit.