This doesn't prove anything. If they wanted to cover it up, they could just photoshop it out of the image and leave it there rather than pulling an entire image to give conspiracy theory idiots something to bite on.
This is what I love about conspiracy theories; they assume a level of coordination and competence involved in a cover up that isn't borne out by the evidence they use to support that assertion.
Also, the original picture he shows is probably a picture of V838 Monocerotis, a red variable star that's 20000 light-years away. Here it is:
What further casts doubt on the whole cover up is that if this planet existed and posed any threat to Earth (which is often claimed that it will hit the Earth; why else would there be a cover-up?) any jackass with a telescope could see it. In fact, if it were due to arrive in 2012 it'd already be close enough to see with the naked eye.
Bah, beaten by jmp. Well, whatever.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Guys! Look up in the sky! You'll see a giant glowing orb of incoming death!!! Nibiru!?!?!?! If you look long and close enough, you'll see space pirates ready to plunder our gold!!!!!
Guys! Look up in the sky! You'll see a giant glowing orb of incoming death!!! Nibiru!?!?!?! If you look long and close enough, you'll see space pirates ready to plunder our gold!!!!!
I think that Explains what I thought of your post.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Oh, People and their Heroine Herobrine Addictions..
A failed Star would have to be about 8 times Larger then Jupiter to be considered that.
No, 8 Jovian masses isn't really big enough to be considered a failed star (more correctly, a brown dwarf). The current lower limit is defined by the IAU to be 13 Jovian masses. The upper limit is about 80 Jovian masses (at this point there's enough mass to just about sustain fusion of hydrogen).
And also, it would merely fling way since it is (I am Estimating) 3 times further away then Pluto but has the mass 8 times the size of Jupiter.
Nothing that large exists at that distance, so I don't know what you're talking about. Even hypothetically, there's no reason something that large couldn't exist in a stable orbit at that distance. I doubt it would do much to perturb the planetary orbits, either.
Anything with that size would have made Sol a Binary Star System
No, it wouldn't, because it'd be too small to be considered any kind of star. It'd be just another planet. Even if it was in the brown dwarf range I'm not really sure why classifying the sol system as binary is at all meaningful. It'd be like saying "if it existed, things would be different". Obviously that's the case because it doesn't exist, so such a statement doesn't add anything.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
A failed Star would have to be about 8 times Larger then Jupiter to be considered that.
No, 8 Jovian masses isn't really big enough to be considered a failed star (more correctly, a brown dwarf). The current lower limit is defined by the IAU to be 13 Jovian masses. The upper limit is about 80 Jovian masses (at this point there's enough mass to just about sustain fusion of hydrogen).
I was a bit off, I was just shooting at random, I thought it was 8 Times Larger.. My bad.
And also, it would merely fling way since it is (I am Estimating) 3 times further away then Pluto but has the mass 8 times the size of Jupiter.
Nothing that large exists at that distance, so I don't know what you're talking about. Even hypothetically, there's no reason something that large couldn't exist in a stable orbit at that distance. I doubt it would do much to perturb the planetary orbits, either.
I said that, I never said anything about perturbing Orbits..
Anything with that size would have made Sol a Binary Star System
No, it wouldn't, because it'd be too small to be considered any kind of star. It'd be just another planet. Even if it was in the brown dwarf range I'm not really sure why classifying the sol system as binary is at all meaningful. It'd be like saying "if it existed, things would be different". Obviously that's the case because it doesn't exist, so such a statement doesn't add anything.
Well. I was talking about if anything with that mass was at something like Jupiter's range, which would(I think) just have it suck into the sun(which may start up some random squence of events making it fling out and become a Star System with a Failed Star and a Star in the center, having the Large star take nearly no effect upon it, but would be small enough to consider it something..) or rip the planets between the two of them apart.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Oh, People and their Heroine Herobrine Addictions..
NASA is definitely covering something up...The bastards stole my apple pie and refuse to pay me back for it!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Notch on his twitter: "bugs that feel wrong get fixed"
Do not get attached to your saves, seriously, stuff like this has happened before, if there's something you love and really want to build...Wait for release.
Clearly, google's boob-censoring software is the problem here. V838 Monocerotis looks enough like a boob that the software couldn't tell the difference.
Clearly, google's boob-censoring software is the problem here. V838 Monocerotis looks enough like a boob that the software couldn't tell the difference.
Beware the sky boobs!
Ah, Obviously this guy knows whats happening, all you other folk dont have a clue :Diamond:.
Maybe they had to cover the area so the light coming from it wouldnt disturb detecting the smaller stuff? >_>
This doesn't make any sense. There's nothing there to protect instruments from especially when those instruments are designed to be taking pictures of whatever is there. The tiles for that piece of sky are just broken or missing for no real reason.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Then i followed the same steps that the video covered and it did the same thing.
Can anyone see whats under the black box?
co-ordinates: 5 53 27 -06 10 58.
This is what i got
http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/9106/blackboxi.png
This is what I love about conspiracy theories; they assume a level of coordination and competence involved in a cover up that isn't borne out by the evidence they use to support that assertion.
Also, the original picture he shows is probably a picture of V838 Monocerotis, a red variable star that's 20000 light-years away. Here it is:
http://www.google.com/sky/#latitude=-3. ... I=-1&oI=-1
That's RA 07h 4m 4.85s, dec -3º 50' 50.1"
Here's another picture:
http://www.greatdreams.com/nibiru-possible.jpg
What further casts doubt on the whole cover up is that if this planet existed and posed any threat to Earth (which is often claimed that it will hit the Earth; why else would there be a cover-up?) any jackass with a telescope could see it. In fact, if it were due to arrive in 2012 it'd already be close enough to see with the naked eye.
Bah, beaten by jmp. Well, whatever.
And also, it would merely fling way since it is (I am Estimating) 3 times further away then Pluto but has the mass 8 times the size of Jupiter.
Anything with that size would have made Sol a Binary Star System, or would have merely been flung into deep space.
Now, if you don't mind. Take you and your un-informed self out of here.
HeroineHerobrine Addictions..I think that Explains what I thought of your post.
HeroineHerobrine Addictions..No, 8 Jovian masses isn't really big enough to be considered a failed star (more correctly, a brown dwarf). The current lower limit is defined by the IAU to be 13 Jovian masses. The upper limit is about 80 Jovian masses (at this point there's enough mass to just about sustain fusion of hydrogen).
Nothing that large exists at that distance, so I don't know what you're talking about. Even hypothetically, there's no reason something that large couldn't exist in a stable orbit at that distance. I doubt it would do much to perturb the planetary orbits, either.
No, it wouldn't, because it'd be too small to be considered any kind of star. It'd be just another planet. Even if it was in the brown dwarf range I'm not really sure why classifying the sol system as binary is at all meaningful. It'd be like saying "if it existed, things would be different". Obviously that's the case because it doesn't exist, so such a statement doesn't add anything.
I was a bit off, I was just shooting at random, I thought it was 8 Times Larger.. My bad.
I said that, I never said anything about perturbing Orbits..
Well. I was talking about if anything with that mass was at something like Jupiter's range, which would(I think) just have it suck into the sun(which may start up some random squence of events making it fling out and become a Star System with a Failed Star and a Star in the center, having the Large star take nearly no effect upon it, but would be small enough to consider it something..) or rip the planets between the two of them apart.
HeroineHerobrine Addictions..Do not get attached to your saves, seriously, stuff like this has happened before, if there's something you love and really want to build...Wait for release.
Why?
Maybe something bad is going to happen because
of it and they don't want everyone to freak out about it...
I guess it could just be a normal flaw through...
...
Very good.
I like how this guy does this, does he have another channel for stuff?
nothing of interestSPACE PIRATES!!!11!!YOUR MOVE NASA
The difference between a STRIP mine and a SURFACE mine
Beware the sky boobs!
Ah, Obviously this guy knows whats happening, all you other folk dont have a clue :Diamond:.
and a great finish to those:
-last one is from a NASA state scientist
Steam/PSN/Origin: Stormravenx
This doesn't make any sense. There's nothing there to protect instruments from especially when those instruments are designed to be taking pictures of whatever is there. The tiles for that piece of sky are just broken or missing for no real reason.