Really you are going to go there? You don't like being called a fanboy, but yet you choose to defend bedrock at every chance, I don't get it. We hardly have any decent options on console, 4J's version is no longer supported and updated.
Really you are going to go there? You don't like being called a fanboy, but yet you choose to defend bedrock at every chance, I don't get it. We hardly have any decent options on console, 4J's version is no longer supported and updated.
You can call me whatever you want if it makes you feel better. I'm just stating a fact. I can't help that you don't like that.
The Meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
Join Date:
12/12/2018
Posts:
55
Member Details
Im play only bedrock now and i can say with out question we have ALOT less options then java when it comes to MOST farms....so yeah super fan boy....:)
Im play only bedrock now and i can say with out question we have ALOT less options then java when it comes to MOST farms....so yeah super fan boy....:)
Console versions have never been similar to java version so I don't know why you would compare them really. And if you think that jumping on cires band wagon calling people fanboys for stating simple facts bothers me in the least it really doesn't. Your argument ceases to be valid.
Cire complains that bedrock doesn't do what he wants it to do. Boo hoo. He can play legacy versions or java edition, as can you. He then complains that older versions are no longer supported. Boo hoo. I love battlefield bad company 1. Hey, guess what? That's no longer supported either. But I don't troll on forums complaining about it. It's called change. Not every one likes change. I appreciate that. I still prefer to write letters to people rather than email them. But that doesn't make Email a bad thing I just chose not to use it. YOU HAVE CHOICES!
4J's version was MUCH closer to java then bedrock ever was. When bedrock was just getting started they stated that they planed to be as close to java version as possible with the exception of redstone, but here we are, with more and more and more garbage they put into bedrock, all supposidly because 'we' asked for it to be this way.
I dunno who the hell they are asking, but they better start looking elsewhere for advice. Your right I'm upset that they no longer support a version that at least worked the way I wanted it to, that resembled minecraft the way it is, not this utter garbage we have right now called bedrock.
This isn't change, not when most of the community as a whole come here time and time and time again looking for why something is not working, only to figure out its because bedrock made such changes just to deter certain playstyles.
Well first of there are some great static multiple iron farm designs out there.
I believe I had seen someone in the techrock discord had gotten stackable iron farms to work up to 12 or 16 villages, but in 1.11 they are switching villages to validate via beds, not doors, and this will change that type if design drastically, or kill it all together, so you gotta wait and see on that one
Yeah, I saw these a while back, but they still are not stacked iron golem farms in respects some something like the titan or trench in that they use the same villagers, and same space, more or less making villages use the same area.
In fact, I took it a step further and did manage to stack 8 villages all on top of each other. The most difficult part was that each time a new village was created I had to use 2 new detector villagers. However, that's as far as I took it. 8 villages, with 2 doors, and 2 villagers....it took a very long time to get that far.
It can be done, but it's not worth the time and effort.
I was curious about a workable 16 village iron farm on bedrock edition. Does anyone know if there is one?
Pretty much impossible due to the fact that villagers are not shared between villages like in java version.
Well that sucks. Thank you. I guess I'm gonna build the basic one then
Heh, alot of things suck about bedrock, but its not like we have a choice anymore.
Will that's not strictly true though is it, you actually have quite a lot of choices.
Really you are going to go there? You don't like being called a fanboy, but yet you choose to defend bedrock at every chance, I don't get it. We hardly have any decent options on console, 4J's version is no longer supported and updated.
You can call me whatever you want if it makes you feel better. I'm just stating a fact. I can't help that you don't like that.
Im play only bedrock now and i can say with out question we have ALOT less options then java when it comes to MOST farms....so yeah super fan boy....:)
Console versions have never been similar to java version so I don't know why you would compare them really. And if you think that jumping on cires band wagon calling people fanboys for stating simple facts bothers me in the least it really doesn't. Your argument ceases to be valid.
Cire complains that bedrock doesn't do what he wants it to do. Boo hoo. He can play legacy versions or java edition, as can you. He then complains that older versions are no longer supported. Boo hoo. I love battlefield bad company 1. Hey, guess what? That's no longer supported either. But I don't troll on forums complaining about it. It's called change. Not every one likes change. I appreciate that. I still prefer to write letters to people rather than email them. But that doesn't make Email a bad thing I just chose not to use it. YOU HAVE CHOICES!
4J's version was MUCH closer to java then bedrock ever was. When bedrock was just getting started they stated that they planed to be as close to java version as possible with the exception of redstone, but here we are, with more and more and more garbage they put into bedrock, all supposidly because 'we' asked for it to be this way.
I dunno who the hell they are asking, but they better start looking elsewhere for advice. Your right I'm upset that they no longer support a version that at least worked the way I wanted it to, that resembled minecraft the way it is, not this utter garbage we have right now called bedrock.
This isn't change, not when most of the community as a whole come here time and time and time again looking for why something is not working, only to figure out its because bedrock made such changes just to deter certain playstyles.
Well first of there are some great static multiple iron farm designs out there.
I believe I had seen someone in the techrock discord had gotten stackable iron farms to work up to 12 or 16 villages, but in 1.11 they are switching villages to validate via beds, not doors, and this will change that type if design drastically, or kill it all together, so you gotta wait and see on that one
Find me on YouTube Prowl8413
Find me on Twitter @Prowl8413
Yeah, I saw these a while back, but they still are not stacked iron golem farms in respects some something like the titan or trench in that they use the same villagers, and same space, more or less making villages use the same area.
In fact, I took it a step further and did manage to stack 8 villages all on top of each other. The most difficult part was that each time a new village was created I had to use 2 new detector villagers. However, that's as far as I took it. 8 villages, with 2 doors, and 2 villagers....it took a very long time to get that far.
It can be done, but it's not worth the time and effort.