Alright, these are just a few texture changes, they could probably fixed really easily with a texture pack or if you go into the terrain.png. But I think they need to change them in Vanilla minecraft (I made the demonstrations using Painterly's texture pack, so credz to Painterly). First of all, pumpkins don't normally grow carved faces. They should be found naturally just plain. If you make a jack o lantern, THEN they have the face.
I end with one more texture suggestion. Fully grown crops should look more...wheatlike. To me, the fully grown crops look like cattails, for those of you who don't know what cattails are, here is a picture.
Now, this may just be me, and maybe tampering with unrealistic textures is a bad idea. It just bugs me a little to see pumpkins in my pumpkin patch that have faces (no, I don't actually grow pumpkins, it's for show).
Please respond, tell me what you think of my simple idea.
It's called a texture pack. Either find one you like or make a custom one yourself.
That is barely, if at all, different than saying "there's a mod for that" to a suggestion thread.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
If I helped in any way, don't click that little green +, instead tell me how much you liked the post. (Only those who are incapable of earning rep the hard way have to beg for it in their signatures).
That is barely, if at all, different than saying "there's a mod for that" to a suggestion thread.
Both are reportable. So is saying use a skin, plugin, or anything else like that. As for the actual idea, I also dislike that the pumpkins have faces. Jeb had said something about crafting them into unlit jack o lanterns and changing that but it appears to have been lost in the annals of time.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
I even stated that I know you can re-texture it. This is for VANILLA Minecraft. And it's against the rules to bring up texture packs and mods on suggestion threads. It is way off topic.
I even stated that I know you can re-texture it. This is for VANILLA Minecraft. And it's against the rules to bring up texture packs and mods on suggestion threads. It is way off topic.
Not quite. You can say there are mods or texture packs that do it, but not as a dismissal of the idea. I could say, "How would you like the stuff to look? I personally really like the texture from <texture pack>"
So it can be used as a proof of concept, but not as a way to say the suggestion is invalid.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
Its just a suggestion, don't get your panties in a bunch. That's why it's called a suggestion, you suggest it, and people tell you if they like it or not. And at least my ideas can be quickly and easily done. It would probably only take 7 minutes to do everything I suggested.
I disagree with everything the diamond is fine and is the most iconic item in the game, wheat is ok and how do they look like catails? Catails are way different looking.
Here is an idea Jeb had a while ago that fell into the abyss of nothingness. You have to carve a pumpkin. Of course, maybe you could use the guts to make a pie. That's an entire different idea, though. But maybe you have to carve it with a sword, then you can make it a jack-o-lantern. Besides, you can't see for **** out of a pumpkin anyways...
Alright, so here we go. (yes, it is a texture pack, I can't texture for ****. It is just to demonstrate what I mean.) First picture is a carved pumpkin, the second is uncarved. it looks a lot more natural, and it makes sense to see these growing in the forest.
And then there is wheat. First doesn't look much like wheat, and it looks messy and unkempt. The second is nice to the eyes, and more orderly, like it was planted by a human being.
And for the diamond, I am starting to agree. It is very iconic to the game, and I don't think it would make sense changing it. I am going to edit the original post.
I end with one more texture suggestion. Fully grown crops should look more...wheatlike. To me, the fully grown crops look like cattails, for those of you who don't know what cattails are, here is a picture.
Now, this may just be me, and maybe tampering with unrealistic textures is a bad idea. It just bugs me a little to see pumpkins in my pumpkin patch that have faces (no, I don't actually grow pumpkins, it's for show).
Please respond, tell me what you think of my simple idea.
That is barely, if at all, different than saying "there's a mod for that" to a suggestion thread.
If I helped in any way, don't click that little green +, instead tell me how much you liked the post. (Only those who are incapable of earning rep the hard way have to beg for it in their signatures).
Both are reportable. So is saying use a skin, plugin, or anything else like that. As for the actual idea, I also dislike that the pumpkins have faces. Jeb had said something about crafting them into unlit jack o lanterns and changing that but it appears to have been lost in the annals of time.
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/minecraft-discussion/suggestions/2775557-guidelines-for-the-suggestions-forum
Not quite. You can say there are mods or texture packs that do it, but not as a dismissal of the idea. I could say, "How would you like the stuff to look? I personally really like the texture from <texture pack>"
So it can be used as a proof of concept, but not as a way to say the suggestion is invalid.
Want some advice on how to thrive in the Suggestions section? Check this handy list of guidelines and tips for posting your ideas and responding to the ideas of others!
http://www.minecraftforum.net/forums/minecraft-discussion/suggestions/2775557-guidelines-for-the-suggestions-forum
I have vanquished an Ender Dragon.DEAL.WITH.IT!
But there's a difference between suggesting a dragon and thinking that blue diamond is unrealistic and should be changed to yellow.
No one is going to support you on that, and pumpkins will most likely change texture in 1.8 (Since they will be farmable.)
He never said he wanted diamonds to be yellow. He even said yellow would look ugly.
If u don't like it, say so and leave, or tell why, don't bash for no reason!
And, awesome idea, make a poll, that would help! Maybe make the textures as proof of concept, that would help this topic, as everyone likes pictures!
I disagree with everything the diamond is fine and is the most iconic item in the game, wheat is ok and how do they look like catails? Catails are way different looking.
And then there is wheat. First doesn't look much like wheat, and it looks messy and unkempt. The second is nice to the eyes, and more orderly, like it was planted by a human being.
And for the diamond, I am starting to agree. It is very iconic to the game, and I don't think it would make sense changing it. I am going to edit the original post.
I have vanquished an Ender Dragon.DEAL.WITH.IT!