I thank you so many times it would not fit into the word limit.
Finally someone posted this, I noticed that once the anti-rpg thread was stickied less people suggested those hopefully that will be the same here.
I thank you so many times it would not fit into the word limit.
Finally someone posted this, I noticed that once the anti-rpg thread was stickied less people suggested those hopefully that will be the same here.
LOL, I sure hope so to. The t5hread's gotten more support than I would think.
there should be a sign on the top of the forum (not a sticky, but like a banner ad) that says "There will NEVER be guns in minecraft, so don't suggest it"
personally i like the idea of guns, the origional posts' message of smp would be damaged by guns like griefing is a valid one but what about my counterpoint that there is a multitude of multiplayer realms dedicated to war, conquering territory and faction diplomacy, what about the future of minecraft? the turth is minecrafts technological advancement is limited at the current stage and there is vast evidence of the developers intent to expand on this level cap on a societal advancement, it is my opinion that guns would add a difficult-to-achieve power over lesser societies same as diamond weapons and armor do over stone, while not destroying the possibility of revolution over such powers with bows and swords, remember that minecraft is not finished and to deny the game additions such as guns would be holding the game back in terms of multiplayer (a vastly incomplete gametype as seen by the lack of server hosting abilities and lack of exciting gameplay) thank you for reading
personally i like the idea of guns, the origional posts' message of smp would be damaged by guns like griefing is a valid one but what about my counterpoint that there is a multitude of multiplayer realms dedicated to war, conquering territory and faction diplomacy, what about the future of minecraft? the turth is minecrafts technological advancement is limited at the current stage and there is vast evidence of the developers intent to expand on this level cap on a societal advancement, it is my opinion that guns would add a difficult-to-achieve power over lesser societies same as diamond weapons and armor do over stone, while not destroying the possibility of revolution over such powers with bows and swords, remember that minecraft is not finished and to deny the game additions such as guns would be holding the game back in terms of multiplayer (a vastly incomplete gametype as seen by the lack of server hosting abilities and lack of exciting gameplay) thank you for reading
They're related to war but if they are why don't they install SDK's gun mod? That would work just as well.
Muskets I would be fine with, but not the guns that some people want.
Why is everyone so obsessed with guns, why not try something a bit more accurate to the time than guns, like different kinds of bows, crossbows, etc...
The only argument against guns in minecraft seems to be realism. I mean, really? Realism? There are walking, exploding bushes. Minecraft is about fun, not realism.
And time period? Minecraft doesn't have a time period, its a unique sandbox build/survive game.
Greifing? Griefers grief, theres no other way to put it. Guns won't make this any easier, and if your sever has greifing issues, use anti griefer mods or whitelist.
The only argument against guns in minecraft seems to be realism. I mean, really? Realism? There are walking, exploding bushes. Minecraft is about fun, not realism.
And time period? Minecraft doesn't have a time period, its a unique sandbox build/survive game.
Greifing? Griefers grief, theres no other way to put it. Guns won't make this any easier, and if your sever has greifing issues, use anti griefer mods or whitelist.
The main argument is that it doesn't fit the survival fantasy theme. Shoot that down.
The likelihood of having the ability to create a firearm and/or the difficulty to produce a firearm is moot. TNT, a modern technological advancement, is in Minecraft. Case in point: Musket, even a rifle musket, is doable and sits well with Minecraft's theme.
There is one reason, at least, why guns will not work in minecraft.
Notch said "no guns". So every suggestion refering to guns is pointless. Judgement has been given.
I have yet to see the actual twitter page where he said that. So, until you give me that, I will ignore all statements refuting guns with the 'Notch said no guns' quote. Come up with a good reason why something balanced like the Arquebus on the 'Guns megathread' would not be a good addition to the game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
You invade this world claiming it as your own simply by your presence.
You slaughter animals for their hides and flesh.
You destroy the landscape and gouge out the earth to build your monuments to vanity.
And yet you call me monster.
There is one reason, at least, why guns will not work in minecraft.
Notch said "no guns". So every suggestion refering to guns is pointless. Judgement has been given.
Non-existent proof is non-existent.
The "proof" is that he said no "hand guns or lasers".
"@ELahti @hanknova Hey guys, Minecraft 1.7 will include Guns, have opressive DRM, and will be split into pre-order DLC parts. Also, going MMO" - Quote Notch
Guns would turn Minecraft into an overrated shooting session.
A correctly balanced firearm would not turn MineCraft into an "overrated shooting session". It would be an alternative to the bow, with different use as a weapon.
"@ELahti @hanknova Hey guys, Minecraft 1.7 will include Guns, have opressive DRM, and will be split into pre-order DLC parts. Also, going MMO" - Quote Notch
There will be guns in 1.7, tragic as it may be
Umm, do you really believe that? I feel sorry for you if you can't tell it's a joke.
You invade this world claiming it as your own simply by your presence.
You slaughter animals for their hides and flesh.
You destroy the landscape and gouge out the earth to build your monuments to vanity.
And yet you call me monster.
Looking at my post i facepalm'd.
I put that it was his opinion. Should I add a wall of fame, like people do? Well, if so then maybe people would want to help more :smile.gif:
Finally someone posted this, I noticed that once the anti-rpg thread was stickied less people suggested those hopefully that will be the same here.
LOL, I sure hope so to. The t5hread's gotten more support than I would think.
personally i like the idea of guns, the origional posts' message of smp would be damaged by guns like griefing is a valid one but what about my counterpoint that there is a multitude of multiplayer realms dedicated to war, conquering territory and faction diplomacy, what about the future of minecraft? the turth is minecrafts technological advancement is limited at the current stage and there is vast evidence of the developers intent to expand on this level cap on a societal advancement, it is my opinion that guns would add a difficult-to-achieve power over lesser societies same as diamond weapons and armor do over stone, while not destroying the possibility of revolution over such powers with bows and swords, remember that minecraft is not finished and to deny the game additions such as guns would be holding the game back in terms of multiplayer (a vastly incomplete gametype as seen by the lack of server hosting abilities and lack of exciting gameplay) thank you for reading
They're related to war but if they are why don't they install SDK's gun mod? That would work just as well.
Muskets I would be fine with, but not the guns that some people want.
And time period? Minecraft doesn't have a time period, its a unique sandbox build/survive game.
Greifing? Griefers grief, theres no other way to put it. Guns won't make this any easier, and if your sever has greifing issues, use anti griefer mods or whitelist.
The main argument is that it doesn't fit the survival fantasy theme. Shoot that down.
All this is just bickering.
I have yet to see the actual twitter page where he said that. So, until you give me that, I will ignore all statements refuting guns with the 'Notch said no guns' quote. Come up with a good reason why something balanced like the Arquebus on the 'Guns megathread' would not be a good addition to the game.
You slaughter animals for their hides and flesh.
You destroy the landscape and gouge out the earth to build your monuments to vanity.
And yet you call me monster.
~creeper
Non-existent proof is non-existent.
The "proof" is that he said no "hand guns or lasers".
"@ELahti @hanknova Hey guys, Minecraft 1.7 will include Guns, have opressive DRM, and will be split into pre-order DLC parts. Also, going MMO" - Quote Notch
There will be guns in 1.7, tragic as it may be
A correctly balanced firearm would not turn MineCraft into an "overrated shooting session". It would be an alternative to the bow, with different use as a weapon.
Umm, do you really believe that? I feel sorry for you if you can't tell it's a joke.
You slaughter animals for their hides and flesh.
You destroy the landscape and gouge out the earth to build your monuments to vanity.
And yet you call me monster.
~creeper