My only real complaint about the removal of roses is that I really, really don't like the style of sprites these days. They don't fit well with the old sprites at all, the horse armor, for instance, looks like something from a bad mod. The new flowers are the same way, they just don't look good. Honestly, I wish that Notch would at least keep doing the sprites, even if he doesn't do anything else for Minecraft now.
Yes but we didn't need a huge thread about it. Anyway there are 2 or 3 more to chose from.
I'm not sure if you know how message boards work, but I can tell you this much: the reason this thread got huge is because apparently a lot of people care about it. Yes, there are also a lot of people posting about how much they don't care, but now we've reached a part of the internet I don't understand, because if they discare so much, why do they post and keep the thread going?
What does 'tailor' mean in this context.
People change Minecraft to suit their tastes. At its core, the game stays the same. "Tailor" would be a catch-all term for resource packs, texture packs, plugins, mods, custom maps, and other tools like world-edit.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I think you are going to love my Survival Let's Play series on YouTube! It's called Spaceboot1's Garden. I make pretty things.
I am just going to add, that if the rose was retextured and renamed to something different, then it isn't a rose anymore, thus the single rose is still no longer in the game. So the whole 'It's still there, it's just not.' thing doesn't really work.
The poppy and rose are a few pixels away from each other, and they do the exact same thing. The rose is still in the game, it's just been renamed, which can be fixed with a language pack if it bothers you so much.
The poppy and rose are a few pixels away from each other, and they do the exact same thing. The rose is still in the game, it's just been renamed, which can be fixed with a language pack if it bothers you so much.
No, the rose is not in the game. The Poppy is. Unless somehow you people got the official definition of the word poppy changed to 'a rose', then no, they are still not the exact same thing.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The problem with the truth, is that it never lies.
To be honest you sound... lets just say wrong.
And people say that they dont care because they want to counter your opinion.
And to be honest for me it just seems like you just want to push opinion on people and not discuss it.
I appreciate when people want to argue with me. I actually really like arguing, as long as it stays civil and on-topic. The problem is with people arguing about how much I care, and whether I should care. The fact is, I care about losing the rose, and I could be completely dead wrong, but I can't change how I feel.
And there don't seem to be two equally balanced sides in this thread either. There isn't a side that says "I hate the rose and good riddance" (though I think a few people have said this). There's mostly a split between people saying "I really really want the rose to stay" and people saying "meh, whatever".
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I think you are going to love my Survival Let's Play series on YouTube! It's called Spaceboot1's Garden. I make pretty things.
lol it's ridiculous. Everytimes I come on these forums and see this thread still around ... it shocks me how anyone could complain about something so stupid.
As for it being a legitimate issue? Let just say you are correct. Then that means, every single part of the game is an issue. I bet there are people out there who don't like the wool. I bet there are people out there who don't like the cats, and so on and so fourth. There will always be people who don't like something about a certain part of the game. So if we count them all as issues, fine. Well then we have to filter out which ones are more important, and which ones are just plain stupidity.
This rose thing is stupidity. It's like a kid crying because he or she didn't get the color ice cream they wanted. You know. . cause the color is soooo important.
Now of course, as I said before, there are people who don't like all sorts of things in minecraft. However, you don't see a thread for every little thing. Why? .... because it's childish and they know better then to complain about it. They are smart enough to simply just ignore or get over it.
Now keep in mind, I am not saying people should not complain. However, I feel there really needs to be a good reason for it.
No, the rose is not in the game. The Poppy is. Unless somehow you people got the official definition of the word poppy changed to 'a rose', then no, they are still not the exact same thing.
You have severely misunderstood my position. I never said the poppy and rose were exactly the same, however the poppy and rose have the same function, have almost identical sprites and even have the same item id. The only major difference is the name, which such a trivial issue that it shouldn't matter.
You have severely misunderstood my position. I never said the poppy and rose were exactly the same, however the poppy and rose have the same function, have almost identical sprites and even have the same item id. The only major difference is the name, which such a trivial issue that it shouldn't matter.
Well obviously it does matter to Spaceboot as he made this topic. It is understandable if you disagree with his position, but I die a little inside whenever I see someone on this thread use that stupid, fallacious, and generally just wrong argument.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The problem with the truth, is that it never lies.
Well obviously it does matter to Spaceboot as he made this topic.
However it shouldn't. This issue is trivial.
All of the premises Spaceboot laid out in his OP have been proven wrong countless times. Since he drew his conclusion from flawed premises, his conclusion is also therefore wrong. This topic should be locked, as it's pointless to argue our point any further.
It is understandable if you disagree with his position, but I die a little inside whenever I see someone on this thread use that stupid, fallacious, and generally just wrong argument.
If you are trying to convince someone of a point, it is up to you to prove that your point is valid.
Obviously not, as you are still arguing your point further. So either it is not pointless to do so or you are doing a task which you know is pointless.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
The problem with the truth, is that it never lies.
This thread is now locked. The constant arguing and flame that plague this thread shall be no more of that. Looking into the past pages. This thread should have been locked a long time ago.
I believe the worst comparison would be getting rid of creepers or diamonds.
But fine. Lets get rid of lapis then and replace the blue dye with a flower! Lets see how many people scream at me for this.
Okay, here's a tweet from Dinnerbone.
I'm not sure if you know how message boards work, but I can tell you this much: the reason this thread got huge is because apparently a lot of people care about it. Yes, there are also a lot of people posting about how much they don't care, but now we've reached a part of the internet I don't understand, because if they discare so much, why do they post and keep the thread going?
People change Minecraft to suit their tastes. At its core, the game stays the same. "Tailor" would be a catch-all term for resource packs, texture packs, plugins, mods, custom maps, and other tools like world-edit.
Want to play Minecraft SSP like Spaceboot1? Try my modpack, all mods made by me, Spaceboot1!
He has not pushed his opinion on anyone thus far this thread, all he has done was state his opinion.
The poppy and rose are a few pixels away from each other, and they do the exact same thing. The rose is still in the game, it's just been renamed, which can be fixed with a language pack if it bothers you so much.
No, the rose is not in the game. The Poppy is. Unless somehow you people got the official definition of the word poppy changed to 'a rose', then no, they are still not the exact same thing.
I appreciate when people want to argue with me. I actually really like arguing, as long as it stays civil and on-topic. The problem is with people arguing about how much I care, and whether I should care. The fact is, I care about losing the rose, and I could be completely dead wrong, but I can't change how I feel.
And there don't seem to be two equally balanced sides in this thread either. There isn't a side that says "I hate the rose and good riddance" (though I think a few people have said this). There's mostly a split between people saying "I really really want the rose to stay" and people saying "meh, whatever".
Want to play Minecraft SSP like Spaceboot1? Try my modpack, all mods made by me, Spaceboot1!
Childish for supporting something they believe in? The issue is still legitimate no matter how small it may seem.
As for it being a legitimate issue? Let just say you are correct. Then that means, every single part of the game is an issue. I bet there are people out there who don't like the wool. I bet there are people out there who don't like the cats, and so on and so fourth. There will always be people who don't like something about a certain part of the game. So if we count them all as issues, fine. Well then we have to filter out which ones are more important, and which ones are just plain stupidity.
This rose thing is stupidity. It's like a kid crying because he or she didn't get the color ice cream they wanted. You know. . cause the color is soooo important.
Now of course, as I said before, there are people who don't like all sorts of things in minecraft. However, you don't see a thread for every little thing. Why? .... because it's childish and they know better then to complain about it. They are smart enough to simply just ignore or get over it.
Now keep in mind, I am not saying people should not complain. However, I feel there really needs to be a good reason for it.
Well obviously it does matter to Spaceboot as he made this topic. It is understandable if you disagree with his position, but I die a little inside whenever I see someone on this thread use that stupid, fallacious, and generally just wrong argument.
All of the premises Spaceboot laid out in his OP have been proven wrong countless times. Since he drew his conclusion from flawed premises, his conclusion is also therefore wrong. This topic should be locked, as it's pointless to argue our point any further.
If you are trying to convince someone of a point, it is up to you to prove that your point is valid.
Obviously not, as you are still arguing your point further. So either it is not pointless to do so or you are doing a task which you know is pointless.
~Locked